Yesterday, as now happens for more than a month and 80% of the day, including night, I reflected on the chaos surrounding the discussion of our destiny, the destiny of the ISAE. In particular, I reflected on a statement, one of many that affect us during these days made by people more or less close. The statement is as follows: "The impression is that you do not know what you want." Yet we thought they were clear. We want to do what we have done until now. It does not matter if the name of ISAE, Goofy, Pluto and Donald Duck, we want to fulfill our duties in the service of the state.
I wondered why this simple message was not passed and if there had actually been our fault. Then came to me to mind a metaphor. The flock of starlings. Often we are fascinated by the evolution of the flock that sembra descrivere, nell’insieme, un disegno e una traiettoria specifica, mentre è noto che il morbido evolversi delle geometrie non è che il frutto della casuale organizzazione di un insieme di comportamenti meramente adattivi a ciò che è immediatamente vicino. Come si può addebitare al singolo uccello il continuo cambio di direzione quando questo è immerso in un sistema caotico in cui, apparentemente, nessun singolo ha il potere di determinare la dinamica dell’intero sistema? Ma sopratutto, come possono essere tutti gli altri storni a imputare a un singolo l’ondeggiare dello stormo?
Preso da un ulteriore attacco di sconforto, mi è venuta l’idea di arrendermi. In particolare I was reminded of a phrase like: "Ok, since we are the cause of the chaos, I give up, the sovereign parliament will choose the best for all." Then thought I've got a bit 'up and tried to pull the row. There was something wrong. I'm not questioning the ability of parliament to choose a far-sighted, I'm questioning, at least in this specific case, its effective sovereignty.
In meetings and in Xinjiang are the positions that emerged were the most disparate. Assumption of office on the parliament, the view expressed by several members of that group, I heard: Our country is not so evolved to accept an authority independent of government finance, the General Accounting Office will not accept a counter altar administrations of both the House and Senate would not know how to handle and are therefore contrary to your framework in a support activity Parliamentary inside the parliament itself, the individuals now working as support to the legislative body are opposed to the idea of \u200b\u200bexpanding the core, this government wants to strengthen the powers of the parliament, not even the MEF wants to strengthen the powers parliament and, perhaps above all, can not wait to grab the researchers of the ISAE. Finally, on the assumption di confluire all’ISTAT, alcuni riferivano che i ricercatori di quest’ultimo istituto non vogliono quelli dell’ISAE perché si creerebbero dei conflitti per le loro carriere, una specie di guerra tra poveri. Poi ci sono varie altre voci, ma che sono semplici variazioni sul tema. In somma, pur essendo inutili, sembrerebbe che tutti ci temano e/o ci vorrebbero al loro servizio.
Tra le varie posizioni quella che sembra destinata a soccombere quasi certamente perché di gran lunga più debole rispetto alle altre espresse dai poteri forti, sembra proprio quella manifestata da molti dei componenti del parlamento stesso, e cioè quella di utilizzare al meglio i ricercatori dell’ISAE mettendoli al servizio across the country and only they, or some of them, does not seem to see in us a threat but an asset. But alas, the clash with the other powers it would seem to leave a parliament with limited sovereignty.
may be true, at this point I do not know even what is the best. But perhaps because I think what is best for everyone, not what is best for me.
Marco Fioramanti - Researcher ISAE
0 comments:
Post a Comment