publishing the summary of 377 session during which the fate of the ISAE was marked (almost?) Finally:
He indicated the opposite orientation on all amendment proposals aside with reference to Article 7. (...)
Undersecretary CASER gave its assent to that of the Rapporteur.
(...)
In explanation of vote shall be the senator MORANDO ( PD), which highlight the proposed 7.60, similar to measures introduced by the Government, provides for the transfer of staff ISAE, Ministry of Economy and Finance: it also provides - as also mentioned in a number of proposals signed by Senator Baldassarri - the possibility that, on the basis of special agreements, the search paths are carried out in support of activities parliamentary oversight on public finance. This is a prediction consistent with the contents of the recent reform of the accounting law of the state, enabling initiatives of the Presidencies of both Houses of Parliament in order to strengthen the instruments for parliamentary control over public finance. In this context, it is necessary to give his opinion parliamentary structures appropriate tools of economic analysis, being independent from the hoped- by the Government. Therefore considers unjustified closure manifested in this regard by the majority, so the speaker asking for an additional charge of reflection with a view to a possible revision of opinion.
Senator Mascitelli ( IdV ), have just joined the considerations expressed by Senator Morando, adds his signature to the amendment 7.60, which in his opinion bears more complete joint proposal to 7.64, similar content, presented by its Parliamentary Group.
Senator GRILLO ( PDL), recalls his previous experience of Senator superintendent, notes how, in the logic of a progressive rationalization of expenditure, it is appropriate to overcome the structural weakness of the Parliament in carrying out activities of economic analysis, expressing the hope that as soon as the introduction of a single service documentation and research as already happens in the U.S. . It is therefore associated orientation expressed by Senator Morando, with a view to strengthening the autonomy of Parliament in research in these areas.
Senator BALDASSARRI (PDL ) takes this opportunity to express their opinion in favor on Amendment 7.67, as previously observed suppression could lead to ISAE positive effects on financial markets and a reduction of transparency and certainty of public finances, since Italy would deprive itself of a public institution of economic analysis.
perspective instead of a new function of that institution, Amendments 7.69 and 7.74 are direct, with different wording, to guide the study and economic analysis of the ISAE in support of parliamentary bodies, based on the model of the Congressional Budget Office in the United States. 7.0.12 The proposal aims instead to set up an independent audit of accounts with responsibility for Public Administration, is unacceptable given that the current shortage controls on government budgets.
After expressing appreciation for the constant update of activities carried out by ISAE on economic data, data considered of strategic importance for political decision-making, shows the need for a revision of the opinion of the Speaker, in light of the various options presented under the proposed amendments that is a signatory.
Senator Massimo GARAVAGLIA (LNP ) spoke in passing by this time the hypothesis that it is preferable to bring together the ISTAT ISAE within the structures, in light of the amendment provides 7.75 .
Senator BALDASSARRI (PDL ) takes this opportunity to declare its strong opposition to the amendment on 7.75, since it is designed to disperse the staff at the ISTAT ISAE also, but reiterates its direction favorable to 'amendment 7.67, with a view to postpone the decision on the fate of the ISAE to an intervention of a more organic. Furthermore, the abolition of this institution would result in a saving of expenditure amounting to 130 000 €, in his opinion paltry sum compared with the objectives of public expenditure outlined by the operation
Senator DE ANGELIS (PDL ) herald in the its orientation opposed to Amendment 7.60, agrees with the position taken by the majority in this regard.
Azzollini The Chairman-Rapporteur, while acknowledging the suggestions and proposals made by Senators and Morando Baldassarri, in his opinion notes that there are no conditions to properly evaluate proposed solutions, even though they are worthy of careful reflection. In this context, the ISAE assigned to the Ministry without prejudice so many possibilities that need to carry out a thorough review later. Then concludes by confirming the opposite direction on amendments concerning the regulation of the ISAE.
La Commissione respinge quindi l'emendamento 7.60.
Previa verifica del numero legale disposta dal Presidente su richiesta del senatore BALDASSARRI ( PdL ), la Commissione respinge l'emendamento 7.67 (testo 2).
All'esito di successive separate votazioni, la Commissione respinge gli emendamenti 7.69, 7.74 (testo 2), 7.75, (...).
0 comments:
Post a Comment